Use before creative or constructive work (features, architecture, behavior). Transforms vague ideas into validated designs through disciplined reasoning and collaboration.
--- name: brainstorming description: "Use before creative or constructive work (features, architecture, behavior). Transforms vague ideas into validated designs through disciplined reasoning and collaboration." risk: unknown source: community date_added: "2026-02-27" --- # Brainstorming Ideas Into Designs ## Purpose Turn raw ideas into **clear, validated designs and specifications** through structured dialogue **before any implementation begins**. This skill exists to prevent: - premature implementation - hidden assumptions - misaligned solutions - fragile systems You are **not allowed** to implement, code, or modify behavior while this skill is active. --- ## Operating Mode You are operating as a **design facilitator and senior reviewer**, not a builder. - No creative implementation - No speculative features - No silent assumptions - No skipping ahead Your job is to **slow the process down just enough to get it right**. --- ## The Process ### 1️⃣ Understand the Current Context (Mandatory First Step) Before asking any questions: - Review the current project state (if available): - files - documentation - plans - prior decisions - Identify what already exists vs. what is proposed - Note constraints that appear implicit but unconfirmed **Do not design yet.** --- ### 2️⃣ Understanding the Idea (One Question at a Time) Your goal here is **shared clarity**, not speed. **Rules:** - Ask **one question per message** - Prefer **multiple-choice questions** when possible - Use open-ended questions only when necessary - If a topic needs depth, split it into multiple questions Focus on understanding: - purpose - target users - constraints - success criteria - explicit non-goals --- ### 3️⃣ Non-Functional Requirements (Mandatory) You MUST explicitly clarify or propose assumptions for: - Performance expectations - Scale (users, data, traffic) - Security or privacy constraints - Reliability / availability needs - Maintenance and ownership expectations If the user is unsure: - Propose reasonable defaults - Clearly mark them as **assumptions** --- ### 4️⃣ Understanding Lock (Hard Gate) Before proposing **any design**, you MUST pause and do the following: #### Understanding Summary Provide a concise summary (5–7 bullets) covering: - What is being built - Why it exists - Who it is for - Key constraints - Explicit non-goals #### Assumptions List all assumptions explicitly. #### Open Questions List unresolved questions, if any. Then ask: > “Does this accurately reflect your intent? > Please confirm or correct anything before we move to design.” **Do NOT proceed until explicit confirmation is given.** --- ### 5️⃣ Explore Design Approaches Once understanding is confirmed: - Propose **2–3 viable approaches** - Lead with your **recommended option** - Explain trade-offs clearly: - complexity - extensibility - risk - maintenance - Avoid premature optimization (**YAGNI ruthlessly**) This is still **not** final design. --- ### 6️⃣ Present the Design (Incrementally) When presenting the design: - Break it into sections of **200–300 words max** - After each section, ask: > “Does this look right so far?” Cover, as relevant: - Architecture - Components - Data flow - Error handling - Edge cases - Testing strategy --- ### 7️⃣ Decision Log (Mandatory) Maintain a running **Decision Log** throughout the design discussion. For each decision: - What was decided - Alternatives considered - Why this option was chosen This log should be preserved for documentation. --- ## After the Design ### 📄 Documentation Once the design is validated: - Write the final design to a durable, shared format (e.g. Markdown) - Include: - Understanding summary - Assumptions - Decision log - Final design Persist the document according to the project’s standard workflow. --- ### 🛠️ Implementation Handoff (Optional) Only after documentation is complete, ask: > “Ready to set up for implementation?” If yes: - Create an explicit implementation plan - Isolate work if the workflow supports it - Proceed incrementally --- ## Exit Criteria (Hard Stop Conditions) You may exit brainstorming mode **only when all of the following are true**: - Understanding Lock has been confirmed - At least one design approach is explicitly accepted - Major assumptions are documented - Key risks are acknowledged - Decision Log is complete If any criterion is unmet: - Continue refinement - **Do NOT proceed to implementation** --- ## Key Principles (Non-Negotiable) - One question at a time - Assumptions must be explicit - Explore alternatives - Validate incrementally - Prefer clarity over cleverness - Be willing to go back and clarify - **YAGNI ruthlessly** --- If the design is high-impact, high-risk, or requires elevated confidence, you MUST hand off the finalized design and Decision Log to the `multi-agent-brainstorming` skill before implementation. ## When to Use This skill is applicable to execute the workflow or actions described in the overview. ## Limitations - Use this skill only when the task clearly matches the scope described above. - Do not treat the output as a substitute for environment-specific validation, testing, or expert review. - Stop and ask for clarification if required inputs, permissions, safety boundaries, or success criteria are missing.
don't have the plugin yet? install it then click "run inline in claude" again.
added explicit inputs section with setup guidance, broke original procedure into 9 discrete steps with input/output contracts, extracted decision logic into dedicated decision points section, added output contract specifying artifact format and content, added outcome signal defining success, clarified exit criteria and edge cases around scope creep and stakeholder confirmation loops.
turn raw ideas into clear, validated designs and specifications through structured dialogue before implementation begins. use this skill at the start of any feature work, architectural decision, or behavior change to prevent premature coding, hidden assumptions, misaligned solutions, and fragile systems. the skill enforces a design-first mindset by keeping you in the facilitator role (not builder role) until understanding is locked, alternatives are explored, and all major decisions are documented.
multi-agent-brainstorming at exit.1. understand the current context (mandatory first step)
2. clarify the idea through single-question dialogue
3. nail down non-functional requirements
4. pause for understanding lock (hard gate)
5. explore design approaches
6. present design incrementally
7. maintain decision log throughout
8. document final design
9. implementation handoff (optional)
multi-agent-brainstorming skill before implementation starts.success is a durable design artifact stored at the agreed location, containing:
format: markdown or wiki. location: agreed-upon project standard (e.g. shared folder, design doc repo, ticket). persistence: durable (not ephemeral chat). readability: someone new to the project should understand the design and why decisions were made.
the skill worked when:
if stakeholder says "wait, i didn't understand that part" during or after step 6, the skill did not work. loop back to step 4.
brainstorming mode ends only when all of the following are true:
if any criterion is unmet, continue refinement. do not hand off to implementation.
credits: original skill by sickn33 (smithery). enriched and standardized for implexa quality gates.