Write point-by-point rebuttals to reviewer comments. Extract concerns from reviews, generate evidence-based responses, and format as a structured rebuttal…
Rebuttal Writing Generate structured, evidence-based rebuttals to peer review comments. Input $0 — Reviewer comments (text file, or pasted directly) Optional: current paper draft for reference References Rebuttal prompts and format templates: ~/.claude/skills/rebuttal-writing/references/rebuttal-prompts.md Workflow Step 1: Parse Review Comments For each reviewer: Extract individual concerns/questions/weaknesses Categorize each: major concern, minor concern, question, suggestion Identify the core issue behind each concern Step 2: Generate Responses For each concern: Acknowledge the reviewer's point Respond with evidence — cite specific sections, equations, experiments, or results from the paper Describe what was done (not what will be done) — "We have added...", "Our experiments show..." If additional experiments are needed, describe the new results concretely Step 3: Format Rebuttal Use the standard rebuttal format: # Response to Reviewers We thank all reviewers for their constructive feedback. We address each concern below. ## Reviewer #1 **Concern #1:** [extracted concern] **Author Response:** [detailed response with evidence] **Concern #2:** [extracted concern] **Author Response:** [detailed response with evidence] ## Reviewer #2 ... Step 4: Summary of Changes Add a brief summary at the top listing all major changes made to the paper: New experiments added Sections revised Clarifications made Rules Reply with what was done, not what will be done — "We have conducted additional experiments" not "We will conduct..." Be specific — Reference exact sections, table numbers, equation numbers Be respectful — Thank reviewers, acknowledge valid concerns Address every concern — Do not skip any reviewer point Provide evidence — Every response should include concrete data, citations, or reasoning Keep responses concise — Detailed enough to address the concern, but not padded Highlight changes — When referring to modified text, use blue text or clearly mark revisions Related Skills Upstream: self-review, paper-revision Downstream: paper-compilation See also: data-analysis
don't have the plugin yet? install it then click "run inline in claude" again.