Analyzes Axiom query patterns to find unused data, then builds dashboards and monitors for cost optimization. Use when asked to reduce Axiom costs, find unused…
Axiom Cost Control
Dashboards, monitors, and waste identification for Axiom usage optimization.
Before You Start
Load required skills:
skill: axiom-sre
skill: building-dashboards
Building-dashboards provides: dashboard-list, dashboard-get, dashboard-create, dashboard-update, dashboard-delete
Find the audit dataset. Try axiom-audit first:
['axiom-audit']
| where _time > ago(1h)
| summarize count() by action
| where action in ('usageCalculated', 'runAPLQueryCost')
If not found → ask user. Common names: axiom-audit-logs-view, audit-logs
If found but no usageCalculated events → wrong dataset, ask user
Verify axiom-history access (required for Phase 4):
['axiom-history'] | where _time > ago(1h) | take 1
If not found, Phase 4 optimization will not work.
Confirm with user:
Deployment name?
Audit dataset name?
Contract limit in TB/day? (required for Phase 3 monitors)
Replace <deployment> and <audit-dataset> in all commands below.
Tips:
Run any script with -h for full usage
Do NOT pipe script output to head or tail — causes SIGPIPE errors
Requires jq for JSON parsing
Use axiom-sre's axiom-query for ad-hoc APL, not direct CLI
Which Phases to Run
User request
Run these phases
"reduce costs" / "find waste"
0 → 1 → 4
"set up cost control"
0 → 1 → 2 → 3
"deploy dashboard"
0 → 2
"create monitors"
0 → 3
"check for drift"
0 only
Phase 0: Check Existing Setup
# Existing dashboard?
dashboard-list <deployment> | grep -i cost
# Existing monitors?
axiom-api <deployment> GET "/v2/monitors" | jq -r '.[] | select(.name | startswith("Cost Control:")) | "\(.id)\t\(.name)"'
If found, fetch with dashboard-get and compare to templates/dashboard.json for drift.
Phase 1: Discovery
scripts/baseline-stats -d <deployment> -a <audit-dataset>
Captures daily ingest stats and produces the Analysis Queue (needed for Phase 4).
Phase 2: Dashboard
scripts/deploy-dashboard -d <deployment> -a <audit-dataset>
Creates dashboard with: ingest trends, burn rate, projections, waste candidates, top users. See reference/dashboard-panels.md for details.
Phase 3: Monitors
Contract is required. You must have the contract limit from preflight step 4.
Step 1: List available notifiers
scripts/list-notifiers -d <deployment>
Present the list to the user and ask which notifier they want for cost alerts.
If they don't want notifications, proceed without -n.
Step 2: Create monitors
scripts/create-monitors -d <deployment> -a <audit-dataset> -c <contract_tb> [-n <notifier_id>]
Creates 3 monitors:
Total Ingest Guard — alerts when daily ingest >1.2x contract OR 7-day avg grows >15% vs baseline
Per-Dataset Spike — robust z-score detection, alerts per dataset with attribution
Query Cost Spike — hardened z-score with 30d baseline, 5d exclusion gap, persistence-based gating (median_z > 3, p25_z > 2.5)
The spike monitors use notifyByGroup: true so each dataset triggers a separate alert.
See reference/monitor-strategy.md for threshold derivation.
Phase 4: Optimization
Get the Analysis Queue
Run scripts/baseline-stats if not already done. It outputs a prioritized list:
Priority
Meaning
P0⛔
Top 3 by ingest OR >10% of total — MANDATORY
P1
Never queried — strong drop candidate
P2
Rarely queried (Work/GB < 100) — likely waste
Work/GB = query cost (GB·ms) / ingest (GB). Lower = less value from data.
Analyze datasets in order
Work top-to-bottom. For each dataset:
Step 1: Column analysis
scripts/analyze-query-coverage -d <deployment> -D <dataset> -a <audit-dataset>
If 0 queries → recommend DROP, move to next.
Step 2: Field value analysis
Pick a field from suggested list (usually app, service, or kubernetes.labels.app):
scripts/analyze-query-coverage -d <deployment> -D <dataset> -a <audit-dataset> -f <field>
Note values with high volume but never queried (⚠️ markers).
Step 3: Handle empty values
If (empty) has >5% volume, you MUST drill down with alternative field (e.g., kubernetes.namespace_name).
Step 4: Record recommendation
For each dataset, note: name, ingest volume, Work/GB, top unqueried values, action (DROP/SAMPLE/KEEP), estimated savings.
Done when
All P0⛔ and P1 datasets analyzed. Then compile report using reference/analysis-report-template.md.
Cleanup
# Delete monitors
axiom-api <deployment> GET "/v2/monitors" | jq -r '.[] | select(.name | startswith("Cost Control:")) | "\(.id)\t\(.name)"'
axiom-api <deployment> DELETE "/v2/monitors/<id>"
# Delete dashboard
dashboard-list <deployment> | grep -i cost
dashboard-delete <deployment> <id>
Note: Running create-monitors twice creates duplicates. Delete existing monitors first if re-deploying.
Reference
Audit Dataset Fields
Field
Description
action
usageCalculated or runAPLQueryCost
properties.hourly_ingest_bytes
Hourly ingest in bytes
properties.hourly_billable_query_gbms
Hourly query cost
properties.dataset
Dataset name
resource.id
Org ID
actor.email
User email
Common Fields for Value Analysis
Dataset type
Primary field
Alternatives
Kubernetes logs
kubernetes.labels.app
kubernetes.namespace_name, kubernetes.container_name
Application logs
app or service
level, logger, component
Infrastructure
host
region, instance
Traces
service.name
span.kind, http.route
Units & Conversions
Scripts use TB/day
Dashboard filter uses GB/month
Contract
TB/day
GB/month
5 PB/month
167
5,000,000
10 PB/month
333
10,000,000
15 PB/month
500
15,000,000
Optimization Actions
Signal
Action
Work/GB = 0
Drop or stop ingesting
High-volume unqueried values
Sample or reduce log level
Empty values from system namespaces
Filter at ingest or accept
WoW spike
Check recent deploysdon't have the plugin yet? install it then click "run inline in claude" again.