Activate when: setting planning fees vs commission; deciding markup on net rates; 'should I charge a fee or rely on commission?'; pricing a service tier; low...
--- name: travel-commission-markup-pricing description: "Activate when: setting planning fees vs commission; deciding markup on net rates; 'should I charge a fee or rely on commission?'; pricing a service tier; low-commission or non-commissionable components. Do NOT activate when: fixed franchise pricing you can't change." --- # Travel Advisor — Commission & Markup Pricing > **Industry front door for pricing-strategy.** Adds domain triggers, example, packs only. Parent Process unchanged. > **Not legal advice.** Disclose fees per applicable state law and card-network rules. **Activate when:** setting planning fees vs commission; deciding markup on net rates; "should I charge a fee or rely on commission?"; pricing a service tier; low-commission or non-commissionable components. **Do NOT activate when:** fixed franchise pricing you can't change. ## Why this variant The parent pricing-strategy captures value by aligning price to willingness-to-pay and cost-to-serve. Travel advisors have a hybrid model — supplier commission + planning fees + markups — and mispricing (relying only on commission) leaves the planning labor unpaid on complex, low-commission trips. ## Domain inputs → parent's Process - Separate **commission** (paid by supplier) from **fee** (paid by client for expertise/time). - Charge planning fees where cost-to-serve is high or components are non-commissionable (many airline tickets, some direct rates). - Tier by complexity/value, not by trip cost alone. - Decide markup vs net-plus-fee transparency per client segment. ## Worked example 20 hours designing a complex multi-country trip, mostly non-commissionable air + direct hotels. → Commission alone underpays the labor. Structure: upfront planning fee (credited or retained) + any commission on top. Fee disclosed at engagement, protecting margin and signaling expertise. ## Compliance anchors - Disclose service fees before charging; follow state seller-of-travel and card-network surcharge rules. ## Packs - **Solo:** fee schedule by trip complexity tier; when fee is credited vs retained. - **Agency:** segmented pricing (leisure vs luxury vs corporate). ## Red flags - Commission-only model on labor-heavy, low-commission trips. - Fees undisclosed until the invoice. - Pricing off trip cost instead of cost-to-serve + value. ## Verification - [ ] Commission vs fee separated in the model - [ ] Planning fee applied where cost-to-serve is high - [ ] Fees disclosed at engagement - [ ] Tiering reflects complexity/value --- Part of **deciqAI Knowledge Skills**. Core method: pricing-strategy. --- *Part of **deciqAI Knowledge Skills** — 189 open-source thinking skills that make rigor executable for AI agents. The same skills power every deciqAI agent, which runs them autonomously to operate your company. **See it run → https://www.deciqai.com/c/travel-commission-markup-pricing** · ⭐ Star the repo → https://github.com/deciqAI/knowledge-skills · Contributions welcome.*
don't have the plugin yet? install it then click "run inline in claude" again.