>
sf-diagram-nanobananapro: Salesforce Visual AI Skill Use this skill when the user needs rendered visuals, not text diagrams: ERDs, UI mockups, architecture illustrations, slide-ready images, or image edits using Nano Banana Pro. Hard Gate: Prerequisites First Always run the prerequisites check before using the skill: ~/.claude/skills/sf-diagram-nanobananapro/scripts/check-prerequisites.sh If prerequisites fail, stop and route the user to setup guidance in: references/gemini-cli-setup.md When This Skill Owns the Task Use sf-diagram-nanobananapro when the user wants: PNG / SVG-style image output rendered ERDs or architecture diagrams LWC or Experience Cloud mockups / wireframes visual polish beyond Mermaid edits to a previously generated image Delegate elsewhere when the user wants: Mermaid or text-only diagrams → sf-diagram-mermaid metadata discovery for ERDs → sf-metadata LWC implementation after the mockup → sf-lwc Apex review / implementation → sf-apex Required Context to Gather First Ask for or infer: image type: ERD, UI mockup, architecture illustration, or image edit subject scope and key entities / systems target quality: draft vs presentation vs production asset preferred style and aspect ratio whether the user wants quick mode or an interview-driven prompt build Interview-First Workflow Unless the user explicitly asks for quick/simple/just generate, ask clarifying questions first. Minimum question set Request type Ask about ERD / schema objects, visual style, purpose, extras UI mockup component type, object/context, device/layout, style architecture image systems, boundaries, protocols, emphasis image edit what to keep, what to change, output quality Question bank: references/interview-questions.md Quick mode defaults If the user says “quick”, “simple”, or “just generate”, default to: professional style 1K draft output legend included when helpful one image first, then iterate Recommended Workflow 1. Gather inputs Decide which of these are needed: object list / metadata purpose: draft vs presentation vs documentation desired aesthetic aspect ratio / resolution whether this is a fresh render or edit of an existing image 2. Build a concrete prompt Good prompts specify: subject and scope composition / layout color treatment labels / legends / relationship lines output quality goal 3. Generate a fast draft first gemini --yolo "/generate 'Professional Salesforce ERD with Account, Contact, Opportunity; clean legend; white background; Salesforce-style colors'" 4. Iterate before final Use natural-language edits: gemini --yolo "/edit 'Move Account to center, thicken relationship lines, add legend in bottom right'" 5. Use the Python script for controlled final output Use the script when you need higher resolution or explicit edit inputs: uv run scripts/generate_image.py \ -p "Final production-quality Salesforce ERD with legend and field highlights" \ -f "crm-erd-final.png" \ -r 4K Full iteration guide: references/iteration-workflow.md Default Style Guidance For ERDs, default to the architect.salesforce.com aesthetic unless the user asks otherwise: dark border + light fill cards cloud-specific accent colors clean labels and relationship lines presentation-ready whitespace and hierarchy Style guide: references/architect-aesthetic-guide.md Common Patterns Pattern Default approach visual ERD get metadata if available, then render a draft first LWC mockup use component template + user context + one draft iteration architecture illustration emphasize systems and flows, reduce field-level detail image refinement use /edit for small changes before regenerating final production asset switch to script-driven 2K/4K generation Examples: references/examples-index.md Output / Review Guidance After generating, do one of these: open the file in Preview for visual inspection attach/read the image in the coding session for multimodal review ask the user whether to iterate on layout, labeling, or color before finalizing Keep the first pass cheap; only spend on high-res output after the composition is right. Cross-Skill Integration Need Delegate to Reason Mermaid first draft or text diagram sf-diagram-mermaid faster structural diagramming object / field discovery for ERD sf-metadata accurate schema grounding turn mockup into real component sf-lwc implementation after design review Apex / trigger code in parallel sf-apex code-quality follow-up Reference Map Start here references/gemini-cli-setup.md references/interview-questions.md references/iteration-workflow.md Visual style / examples references/architect-aesthetic-guide.md references/examples-index.md assets/erd/ assets/lwc/ assets/architecture/ assets/review/ Score Guide Score Meaning 70+ strong image prompt / workflow choice 55–69 usable draft with iteration needed 40–54 partial alignment to request < 40 poor fit; re-interview and rebuild prompt
don't have the plugin yet? install it then click "run inline in claude" again.