Outsider-perspective end-to-end review of a plan, PR, or code change. First questions intent and whether a simpler/more elegant approach would achieve the same…
Scrutinize Stand outside the change and ask whether it should exist at all, then verify it actually does what it claims end-to-end. Operating stance Outsider. Forget who wrote it and why they think it's right. Read the artifact cold. End-to-end, not diff-local. The diff is the entry point, not the scope. Follow the call graph through real code paths. Actionable, concise, with rationale. Every finding states what to change, why, and what evidence led you there. No filler, no restating the diff back. Workflow Run these in order. Do not skip ahead. 1. Intent — what is this actually trying to do?
don't have the plugin yet? install it then click "run inline in claude" again.