Review a git diff or explicit file scope for reuse, code quality, efficiency, clarity, and standards issues, then optionally apply safe Codex-driven fixes. Use…
Review and Simplify Changes
Review changed code for reuse, quality, efficiency, and clarity issues. Use Codex sub-agents to review in parallel, but keep those sub-agents read-only: they should only inspect code and send findings back to the main agent. Only the main agent may apply high-confidence, behavior-preserving fixes.
Modes
Choose the mode from the user's request:
review-only: user asks to review, audit, or check the changes
safe-fixes: user asks to simplify, clean up, or refactor the changes
fix-and-validate: same as safe-fixes, but also run the smallest relevant validation after edits
If the user does not specify, default to:
review-only for "review", "audit", or "check"
safe-fixes for "simplify", "clean up", or "refactor"
Step 1: Determine the Scope and Diff Command
related skills
semantically similar in the cross-vendor index
don't have the plugin yet? install it then click "run inline in claude" again.
+clear mode taxonomy (review-only, safe-fixes, fix-and-validate) with sensible defaults based on trigger words
+intentional guard rails: sub-agents remain read-only, only main agent applies fixes, preserving behavior
~procedure cuts off mid-sentence at step 1, leaving steps 2-N completely unwritten - execution path is opaque
~no explicit contract for what 'high-confidence, behavior-preserving' means, no examples of acceptable vs rejected fixes, no failure modes (what if codex suggests breaking changes?)
