Find, evaluate, and maintain high-quality external resources for JavaScript concept documentation, including auditing for broken and outdated links
Skill: Resource Curator for Concept Pages
Use this skill to find, evaluate, add, and maintain high-quality external resources (articles, videos, courses) for concept documentation pages. This includes auditing existing resources for broken links and outdated content.
When to Use
Adding resources to a new concept page
Refreshing resources on existing pages
Auditing for broken or outdated links
Reviewing community-contributed resources
Periodic link maintenance
Resource Curation Methodology
Follow these five phases for comprehensive resource curation.
Phase 1: Audit Existing Resources
Before adding new resources, audit what's already there:
Check link accessibility — Does each link return 200?
Verify content accuracy — Is the content still correct?
Check publication dates — Is it too old for the topic?
Identify outdated content — Does it use old syntax/patterns?
Review descriptions — Are they specific or generic?
Phase 2: Identify Resource Gaps
Compare current resources against targets:
Section
Target Count
Icon
Reference
2-4 MDN links
book
Articles
4-6 articles
newspaper
Videos
3-4 videos
video
Courses
1-3 (optional)
graduation-cap
Books
1-2 (optional)
book
Ask:
Are there enough resources for beginners AND advanced learners?
Is there visual content (diagrams, animations)?
Are official references (MDN) included?
Is there diversity in teaching styles?
Phase 3: Find New Resources
Search trusted sources using targeted queries:
For Articles:
[concept] javascript tutorial site:javascript.info
[concept] javascript explained site:freecodecamp.org
[concept] javascript site:dev.to
[concept] javascript deep dive site:2ality.com
[concept] javascript guide site:css-tricks.com
For Videos:
YouTube: [concept] javascript explained
YouTube: [concept] javascript tutorial
YouTube: jsconf [concept]
YouTube: [concept] javascript fireship
YouTube: [concept] javascript web dev simplified
For MDN:
[concept] site:developer.mozilla.org
[API name] MDN
Phase 4: Write Descriptions
Every resource needs a specific, valuable description:
Formula:
Sentence 1: What makes this resource unique OR what it specifically covers
Sentence 2: Why reader should click (what they'll gain, who it's best for)
Phase 5: Format and Organize
Use correct Card syntax with proper icons
Order resources logically (foundational first, advanced later)
Ensure consistent formatting
Trusted Sources
Reference Sources (Priority Order)
Priority
Source
URL
Best For
1
MDN Web Docs
developer.mozilla.org
API docs, guides, compatibility
2
ECMAScript Spec
tc39.es/ecma262
Authoritative behavior
3
Node.js Docs
nodejs.org/docs
Node-specific APIs
4
Web.dev
web.dev
Performance, best practices
5
Can I Use
caniuse.com
Browser compatibility
Article Sources (Priority Order)
Priority
Source
Why Trusted
1
javascript.info
Comprehensive, exercises, well-maintained
2
MDN Guides
Official, accurate, regularly updated
3
freeCodeCamp
Beginner-friendly, practical
4
2ality (Dr. Axel)
Deep technical dives, spec-focused
5
CSS-Tricks
DOM, visual topics, well-written
6
dev.to (Lydia Hallie)
Visual explanations, animations
7
LogRocket Blog
Practical tutorials, real-world
8
Smashing Magazine
In-depth, well-researched
9
Digital Ocean
Clear tutorials, examples
10
Kent C. Dodds
Testing, React, best practices
Video Creators (Priority Order)
Priority
Creator
Style
Best For
1
Fireship
Fast, modern, entertaining
Quick overviews, modern JS
2
Web Dev Simplified
Clear, beginner-friendly
Beginners, fundamentals
3
Fun Fun Function
Deep-dives, personality
Understanding "why"
4
Traversy Media
Comprehensive crash courses
Full topic coverage
5
JSConf/dotJS
Expert conference talks
Advanced, in-depth
6
Academind
Thorough explanations
Complete understanding
7
The Coding Train
Creative, visual
Visual learners
8
Wes Bos
Practical, real-world
Applied learning
9
The Net Ninja
Step-by-step tutorials
Following along
10
Programming with Mosh
Professional, clear
Career-focused
Course Sources
Source
Type
Notes
javascript.info
Free
Comprehensive, exercises
Piccalilli
Free
Well-written, modern
freeCodeCamp
Free
Project-based
Frontend Masters
Paid
Expert instructors
Egghead.io
Paid
Short, focused lessons
Udemy (top-rated)
Paid
Check reviews carefully
Codecademy
Freemium
Interactive
Quality Criteria
Must Have (Required)
Link works — Returns 200 (not 404, 301, 5xx)
JavaScript-focused — Not primarily about C#, Python, Java, etc.
Technically accurate — No factual errors or anti-patterns
Accessible — Free or has meaningful free preview
Should Have (Preferred)
Recent enough — See publication date guidelines below
Reputable source — From trusted sources list or well-known creator
Unique perspective — Not duplicate of existing resources
Appropriate depth — Matches concept complexity
Good engagement — Positive comments, high views (for videos)
Red Flags (Reject)
Red Flag
Why It Matters
Uses var everywhere
Outdated for ES6+ topics
Teaches anti-patterns
Harmful to learners
Primarily other languages
Wrong focus
Hard paywall (no preview)
Inaccessible
Pre-2015 for modern topics
Likely outdated
Low quality comments
Often indicates issues
Factual errors
Spreads misinformation
Clickbait title, thin content
Wastes reader time
Publication Date Guidelines
Topic Category
Minimum Year
Reasoning
ES6+ Features
2015+
ES6 released June 2015
Promises
2015+
Native Promises in ES6
async/await
2017+
ES2017 feature
ES Modules
2018+
Stable browser support
Optional chaining (?.)
2020+
ES2020 feature
Nullish coalescing (??)
2020+
ES2020 feature
Top-level await
2022+
ES2022 feature
Fundamentals (closures, scope, this)
Any
Core concepts don't change
DOM manipulation
2018+
Modern APIs preferred
Fetch API
2017+
Widespread support
Rule of thumb: For time-sensitive topics, prefer content from the last 3-5 years. For fundamentals, older classic content is often excellent.
Description Writing Guide
The Formula
Sentence 1: What makes this resource unique OR what it specifically covers
Sentence 2: Why reader should click (what they'll gain, who it's best for)
Good Examples
<Card title="JavaScript Visualized: Promises & Async/Await — Lydia Hallie" icon="newspaper" href="https://dev.to/lydiahallie/javascript-visualized-promises-async-await-5gke">
Animated GIFs showing the call stack, microtask queue, and event loop in action.
The visuals make Promise execution order finally click for visual learners.
</Card>
<Card title="What the heck is the event loop anyway? — Philip Roberts" icon="video" href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8aGhZQkoFbQ">
The legendary JSConf talk that made the event loop click for millions of developers.
Philip Roberts' live visualizations are the gold standard — a must-watch.
</Card>
<Card title="You Don't Know JS: Scope & Closures — Kyle Simpson" icon="book" href="https://github.com/getify/You-Dont-Know-JS/blob/2nd-ed/scope-closures/README.md">
Kyle Simpson's deep dive into JavaScript's scope mechanics and closure behavior.
Goes beyond the basics into edge cases and mental models for truly understanding scope.
</Card>
<Card title="JavaScript Promises in 10 Minutes — Web Dev Simplified" icon="video" href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DHvZLI7Db8E">
Quick, clear explanation covering Promise creation, chaining, and error handling.
Perfect starting point if you're new to async JavaScript.
</Card>
<Card title="How to Escape Async/Await Hell — Aditya Agarwal" icon="newspaper" href="https://medium.com/free-code-camp/avoiding-the-async-await-hell-c77a0fb71c4c">
The pizza-and-drinks ordering analogy makes parallel vs sequential execution crystal clear.
Essential reading once you know async/await basics but want to write faster code.
</Card>
Bad Examples (Avoid)
<!-- TOO GENERIC -->
<Card title="Promises Tutorial" icon="newspaper" href="...">
A comprehensive guide to Promises in JavaScript.
</Card>
<!-- NO VALUE PROPOSITION -->
<Card title="Learn Closures" icon="video" href="...">
This video explains closures in JavaScript.
</Card>
<!-- VAGUE, NO SPECIFICS -->
<Card title="JavaScript Guide" icon="newspaper" href="...">
Everything you need to know about JavaScript.
</Card>
<!-- JUST RESTATING THE TITLE -->
<Card title="Understanding the Event Loop" icon="video" href="...">
A video about understanding the event loop.
</Card>
Words and Phrases to Avoid
Avoid
Why
Use Instead
"comprehensive guide to..."
Vague, overused
Specify what's covered
"learn all about..."
Generic
What specifically will they learn?
"everything you need to know..."
Hyperbolic
Be specific
"great tutorial on..."
Subjective filler
Why is it great?
"explains X"
Too basic
How does it explain? What's unique?
"in-depth look at..."
Vague
What depth? What aspect?
Words and Phrases That Work
Good Phrase
Example
"step-by-step walkthrough"
"Step-by-step walkthrough of building a Promise from scratch"
"visual explanation"
"Visual explanation with animated diagrams"
"deep dive into"
"Deep dive into V8's optimization strategies"
"practical examples of"
"Practical examples of closures in React hooks"
"the go-to reference for"
"The go-to reference for array method signatures"
"finally makes X click"
"Finally makes prototype chains click"
"perfect for beginners"
"Perfect for beginners new to async code"
"covers X, Y, and Z"
"Covers creation, chaining, and error handling"
Link Audit Process
Step 1: Check Each Link
For each resource in the concept page:
Click the link — Does it load?
Note the HTTP status:
Status
Meaning
Action
200
OK
Keep, continue to content check
301/302
Redirect
Update to final URL
404
Not Found
Remove or find replacement
403
Forbidden
Check manually, may be geo-blocked
5xx
Server Error
Retry later, may be temporary
Step 2: Content Verification
For each accessible link:
Skim the content — Is it still accurate?
Check the date — When was it published/updated?
Verify JavaScript focus — Is it primarily about JS?
Look for red flags — Anti-patterns, errors, outdated syntax
Step 3: Description Review
For each resource:
Read current description — Is it specific?
Compare to actual content — Does it match?
Check for generic phrases — "comprehensive guide", etc.
Identify improvements — How can it be more specific?
Step 4: Gap Analysis
After auditing all resources:
Count by section — Do we meet targets?
Check diversity — Beginner AND advanced? Visual AND text?
Identify missing types — No MDN? No videos?
Note recommendations — What should we add?
Resource Section Templates
Reference Section
## Reference
<CardGroup cols={2}>
<Card title="[Main Topic] — MDN" icon="book" href="https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/JavaScript/...">
Official MDN documentation covering [specific aspects].
The authoritative reference for [what it's best for].
</Card>
<Card title="[Related API/Concept] — MDN" icon="book" href="https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/JavaScript/...">
[What this reference covers].
Essential reading for understanding [specific aspect].
</Card>
</CardGroup>
Articles Section
## Articles
<CardGroup cols={2}>
<Card title="[Article Title]" icon="newspaper" href="...">
[What makes it unique/what it covers].
[Why read this one/who it's for].
</Card>
<Card title="[Article Title]" icon="newspaper" href="...">
[Specific coverage].
[Value proposition].
</Card>
<Card title="[Article Title]" icon="newspaper" href="...">
[Unique angle].
[Why it's worth reading].
</Card>
<Card title="[Article Title]" icon="newspaper" href="...">
[What it covers].
[Best for whom].
</Card>
</CardGroup>
Videos Section
## Videos
<CardGroup cols={2}>
<Card title="[Video Title] — [Creator]" icon="video" href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=...">
[What it covers/unique approach].
[Why watch/who it's for].
</Card>
<Card title="[Video Title] — [Creator]" icon="video" href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=...">
[Specific focus].
[What makes it stand out].
</Card>
<Card title="[Video Title] — [Creator]" icon="video" href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=...">
[Coverage].
[Value].
</Card>
</CardGroup>
Books Section (Optional)
<Card title="[Book Title] — [Author]" icon="book" href="...">
[What the book covers and its approach].
[Who should read it and what they'll gain].
</Card>
Courses Section (Optional)
<CardGroup cols={2}>
<Card title="[Course Title] — [Platform]" icon="graduation-cap" href="...">
[What the course covers].
[Format and who it's best for].
</Card>
</CardGroup>
Resource Audit Report Template
Use this template to document audit findings.
# Resource Audit Report: [Concept Name]
**File:** `/docs/concepts/[slug].mdx`
**Date:** YYYY-MM-DD
**Auditor:** [Name/Claude]
---
## Summary
| Metric | Count |
|--------|-------|
| Total Resources | XX |
| Working Links (200) | XX |
| Broken Links (404) | XX |
| Redirects (301/302) | XX |
| Outdated Content | XX |
| Generic Descriptions | XX |
## Resource Count vs Targets
| Section | Current | Target | Status |
|---------|---------|--------|--------|
| Reference (MDN) | X | 2-4 | ✅/⚠️/❌ |
| Articles | X | 4-6 | ✅/⚠️/❌ |
| Videos | X | 3-4 | ✅/⚠️/❌ |
| Courses | X | 0-3 | ✅/⚠️/❌ |
---
## Broken Links (Remove or Replace)
| Resource | Line | URL | Status | Action |
|----------|------|-----|--------|--------|
| [Title] | XX | [URL] | 404 | Remove |
| [Title] | XX | [URL] | 404 | Replace with [alternative] |
---
## Redirects (Update URLs)
| Resource | Line | Old URL | New URL |
|----------|------|---------|---------|
| [Title] | XX | [old] | [new] |
---
## Outdated Resources (Consider Replacing)
| Resource | Line | Issue | Recommendation |
|----------|------|-------|----------------|
| [Title] | XX | Published 2014, uses var throughout | Replace with [modern alternative] |
| [Title] | XX | Pre-ES6, no mention of let/const | Find updated version or replace |
---
## Description Improvements Needed
| Resource | Line | Current | Suggested |
|----------|------|---------|-----------|
| [Title] | XX | "A guide to closures" | "[Specific description with value prop]" |
| [Title] | XX | "Learn about promises" | "[What makes it unique]. [Why read it]." |
---
## Missing Resources (Recommendations)
| Type | Gap | Suggested Resource | URL |
|------|-----|-------------------|-----|
| Reference | No main MDN link | [Topic] — MDN | [URL] |
| Article | No beginner guide | [Title] — javascript.info | [URL] |
| Video | No visual explanation | [Title] — [Creator] | [URL] |
| Article | No advanced deep-dive | [Title] — 2ality | [URL] |
---
## Non-JavaScript Resources (Remove)
| Resource | Line | Issue |
|----------|------|-------|
| [Title] | XX | Primarily about C#, not JavaScript |
---
## Action Items
### High Priority (Do First)
1. **Remove broken link:** [Title] (line XX)
2. **Add missing MDN reference:** [Topic]
3. **Replace outdated resource:** [Title] with [alternative]
### Medium Priority
1. **Update redirect URL:** [Title] (line XX)
2. **Improve description:** [Title] (line XX)
3. **Add beginner-friendly article**
### Low Priority
1. **Add additional video resource**
2. **Consider adding course section**
---
## Verification Checklist
After making changes:
- [ ] All broken links removed or replaced
- [ ] All redirect URLs updated
- [ ] Outdated resources replaced
- [ ] Generic descriptions rewritten
- [ ] Missing resource types added
- [ ] Resource counts meet targets
- [ ] All new links verified working
- [ ] All descriptions are specific and valuable
Quick Reference
Icon Reference
Content Type
Icon Value
MDN/Official docs
book
Articles/Blog posts
newspaper
Videos
video
Courses
graduation-cap
Books
book
Related concepts
Context-appropriate
Character Guidelines
Element
Guideline
Card title
Keep concise, include creator for videos
Description sentence 1
What it covers / what's unique
Description sentence 2
Why read/watch / who it's for
Resource Ordering
Within each section, order resources:
Most foundational/beginner-friendly first
Official references before community content
Most highly recommended prominently placed
Advanced/niche content last
Quality Checklist
Link Verification
All links return 200 (not 404, 301)
No redirect chains
No hard paywalls without notice
All URLs are HTTPS where available
Content Quality
All resources are JavaScript-focused
No resources teaching anti-patterns
Publication dates appropriate for topic
Mix of beginner and advanced content
Visual and text resources included
Description Quality
All descriptions are specific (not generic)
Descriptions explain unique value
No "comprehensive guide to..." phrases
Each description is 2 sentences
Descriptions match actual content
Completeness
2-4 MDN/official references
4-6 quality articles
3-4 quality videos
Resources ordered logically
Diversity in teaching styles
Summary
When curating resources for a concept page:
Audit first — Check all existing links and content
Identify gaps — Compare against targets (2-4 refs, 4-6 articles, 3-4 videos)
Find quality resources — Search trusted sources
Write specific descriptions — What's unique + why read/watch
Format correctly — Proper Card syntax, icons, ordering
Document changes — Use the audit report template
Remember: Resources should enhance learning, not pad the page. Every link should offer genuine value. Quality over quantity — a few excellent resources beat many mediocre ones.don't have the plugin yet? install it then click "run inline in claude" again.