back
loading skill details...
Systematic literature-review workflow for academic, biomedical, technical, and scientific topics, including search planning, source screening, synthesis,…
Literature Review
Use this skill when the task is to find, screen, synthesize, and cite a body of
academic or technical literature.
When to Use
Building a systematic, scoping, or narrative literature review.
Synthesizing the state of the art for a research question.
Finding gaps, contradictions, or future-work directions.
Preparing citation-backed background sections for papers or reports.
Comparing evidence across peer-reviewed papers, preprints, patents, and
technical reports.
Review Types
Narrative review: broad synthesis; useful for orientation.
Scoping review: maps concepts, methods, and evidence gaps.
Systematic review: predefined protocol, reproducible search, explicit
screening and exclusion.
Meta-analysis: systematic review plus quantitative effect aggregation.
Ask the user which level of rigor is needed. If unspecified, default to a
scoping review for exploratory work and a systematic review for publication or
clinical claims.
Workflow
1. Define the Question
Convert the prompt into a searchable research question.
For clinical or biomedical work, use PICO:
Population
Intervention or exposure
Comparator
Outcome
For technical work, use:
system or domain
method or intervention
comparison baseline
evaluation metric
2. Plan the Search
Create a search protocol before collecting sources:
databases to search
date range
languages
publication types
inclusion criteria
exclusion criteria
exact search strings
Minimum useful database set:
PubMed for biomedical and life-sciences literature.
arXiv for CS, math, physics, quantitative biology, and preprints.
Semantic Scholar or Crossref for broad academic discovery.
Domain-specific sources when relevant, such as clinical-trial registries,
patent databases, standards bodies, or official technical docs.
3. Search and Log Evidence
Keep a search log that makes the review reproducible:
| Database | Date searched | Query | Filters | Results | Export |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | ---: | --- |
| PubMed | 2026-05-11 | `("CRISPR"[tiab] OR "Cas9"[tiab]) AND "sickle cell"[tiab]` | 2020:2026, English | 86 | PMID list |
| arXiv | 2026-05-11 | `CRISPR sickle cell gene editing` | q-bio, 2020:2026 | 9 | BibTeX |
Save raw IDs, URLs, DOIs, abstracts, and notes separately from the final prose.
4. Deduplicate
Deduplicate in this order:
DOI
PMID or arXiv ID
exact title
normalized title plus first author and year
Record how many duplicates were removed.
5. Screen Sources
Screen in stages:
title
abstract
full text
For systematic work, record exclusion reasons:
wrong population
wrong intervention
wrong outcome
not primary research
duplicate
unavailable full text
outside date range
6. Extract Data
Use a structured extraction table:
| Study | Design | Population/Data | Method | Comparator | Outcome | Key finding | Limitations |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Author Year | RCT/cohort/review/etc. | sample or corpus | method | baseline | measured outcome | result | caveat |
For technical papers, include dataset, benchmark, metric, baseline, and
reproducibility notes.
7. Synthesize
Group evidence by theme rather than summarizing papers one by one.
Useful synthesis lenses:
strongest evidence
conflicting evidence
methodological weaknesses
population or dataset limits
recency and replication
practical implications
unanswered questions
Separate claims by confidence:
High confidence: replicated, high-quality evidence across sources.
Medium confidence: plausible but limited by sample, method, or recency.
Low confidence: early, speculative, single-source, or weakly measured.
8. Verify Citations
Before finalizing:
verify DOI, PMID, arXiv ID, or official URL
check author names and publication year
do not cite a paper for a claim it does not make
mark preprints as preprints
distinguish reviews from primary evidence
Output Template
# Literature Review: <Topic>
Generated: <date>
Review type: <narrative | scoping | systematic | meta-analysis>
Search window: <dates>
Databases: <list>
## Research Question
## Search Strategy
## Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria
## Evidence Summary
## Thematic Synthesis
## Gaps and Limitations
## References
## Search Log
Pitfalls
Do not treat search snippets as evidence.
Do not mix preprints, reviews, and primary studies without labeling them.
Do not omit negative or conflicting findings.
Do not claim systematic-review rigor without a reproducible protocol.
Do not use a single database for a broad claim unless the scope is explicitly
limited to that database.don't have the plugin yet? install it then click "run inline in claude" again.