Evaluate solutions through multi-round debate between independent judges until consensus
judge-with-debate Key benefits: Structured evaluation - Meta-judge produces tailored rubrics and criteria before judging begins Multiple perspectives - Three independent judges reduce individual bias Evidence-based debate - Judges defend positions with specific evidence from the solution and evaluation specification Iterative refinement - Up to 3 debate rounds drive convergence on accurate scores Shared specification - Meta-judge runs once; all judges across all rounds share the same evaluation specification Pattern: Debate-Based Evaluation
don't have the plugin yet? install it then click "run inline in claude" again.