codebase-onboarding

SKILL.md

Codebase Onboarding

Systematically analyze an unfamiliar codebase and produce a structured onboarding guide. Designed for developers joining a new project or setting up Claude Code in an existing repo for the first time.

When to Use

First time opening a project with Claude Code

Joining a new team or repository

User asks "help me understand this codebase"

User asks to generate a CLAUDE.md for a project

User says "onboard me" or "walk me through this repo"

How It Works

Phase 1: Reconnaissance

Gather raw signals about the project without reading every file. Run these checks in parallel:
1. Package manifest detection
   → package.json, go.mod, Cargo.toml, pyproject.toml, pom.xml, build.gradle,
     Gemfile, composer.json, mix.exs, pubspec.yaml

2. Framework fingerprinting
   → next.config.*, nuxt.config.*, angular.json, vite.config.*,
     django settings, flask app factory, fastapi main, rails config

3. Entry point identification
   → main.*, index.*, app.*, server.*, cmd/, src/main/

4. Directory structure snapshot
   → Top 2 levels of the directory tree, ignoring node_modules, vendor,
     .git, dist, build, __pycache__, .next

5. Config and tooling detection
   → .eslintrc*, .prettierrc*, tsconfig.json, Makefile, Dockerfile,
     docker-compose*, .github/workflows/, .env.example, CI configs

6. Test structure detection
   → tests/, test/, __tests__/, *_test.go, *.spec.ts, *.test.js,
     pytest.ini, jest.config.*, vitest.config.*

Phase 2: Architecture Mapping

From the reconnaissance data, identify:

Tech Stack

Language(s) and version constraints

Framework(s) and major libraries

Database(s) and ORMs

Build tools and bundlers

CI/CD platform

Architecture Pattern

Monolith, monorepo, microservices, or serverless

Frontend/backend split or full-stack

API style: REST, GraphQL, gRPC, tRPC

Key Directories
Map the top-level directories to their purpose:

src/components/  → React UI components
src/api/         → API route handlers
src/lib/         → Shared utilities
src/db/          → Database models and migrations
tests/           → Test suites
scripts/         → Build and deployment scripts

Data Flow
Trace one request from entry to response:

Where does a request enter? (router, handler, controller)

How is it validated? (middleware, schemas, guards)

Where is business logic? (services, models, use cases)

How does it reach the database? (ORM, raw queries, repositories)

Phase 3: Convention Detection

Identify patterns the codebase already follows:

Naming Conventions

File naming: kebab-case, camelCase, PascalCase, snake_case

Component/class naming patterns

Test file naming: *.test.ts, *.spec.ts, *_test.go

Code Patterns

Error handling style: try/catch, Result types, error codes

Dependency injection or direct imports

State management approach

Async patterns: callbacks, promises, async/await, channels

Git Conventions

Branch naming from recent branches

Commit message style from recent commits

PR workflow (squash, merge, rebase)

If the repo has no commits yet or only a shallow history (e.g. git clone --depth 1), skip this section and note "Git history unavailable or too shallow to detect conventions"

Phase 4: Generate Onboarding Artifacts

Produce two outputs:

Output 1: Onboarding Guide

# Onboarding Guide: [Project Name]

## Overview
[2-3 sentences: what this project does and who it serves]

## Tech Stack
<!-- Example for a Next.js project — replace with detected stack -->
| Layer | Technology | Version |
|-------|-----------|---------|
| Language | TypeScript | 5.x |
| Framework | Next.js | 14.x |
| Database | PostgreSQL | 16 |
| ORM | Prisma | 5.x |
| Testing | Jest + Playwright | - |

## Architecture
[Diagram or description of how components connect]

## Key Entry Points
<!-- Example for a Next.js project — replace with detected paths -->
- **API routes**: `src/app/api/` — Next.js route handlers
- **UI pages**: `src/app/(dashboard)/` — authenticated pages
- **Database**: `prisma/schema.prisma` — data model source of truth
- **Config**: `next.config.ts` — build and runtime config

## Directory Map
[Top-level directory → purpose mapping]

## Request Lifecycle
[Trace one API request from entry to response]

## Conventions
- [File naming pattern]
- [Error handling approach]
- [Testing patterns]
- [Git workflow]

## Common Tasks
<!-- Example for a Node.js project — replace with detected commands -->
- **Run dev server**: `npm run dev`
- **Run tests**: `npm test`
- **Run linter**: `npm run lint`
- **Database migrations**: `npx prisma migrate dev`
- **Build for production**: `npm run build`

## Where to Look
<!-- Example for a Next.js project — replace with detected paths -->
| I want to... | Look at... |
|--------------|-----------|
| Add an API endpoint | `src/app/api/` |
| Add a UI page | `src/app/(dashboard)/` |
| Add a database table | `prisma/schema.prisma` |
| Add a test | `tests/` matching the source path |
| Change build config | `next.config.ts` |

Output 2: Starter CLAUDE.md

Generate or update a project-specific CLAUDE.md based on detected conventions. If CLAUDE.md already exists, read it first and enhance it — preserve existing project-specific instructions and clearly call out what was added or changed.

# Project Instructions

## Tech Stack
[Detected stack summary]

## Code Style
- [Detected naming conventions]
- [Detected patterns to follow]

## Testing
- Run tests: `[detected test command]`
- Test pattern: [detected test file convention]
- Coverage: [if configured, the coverage command]

## Build & Run
- Dev: `[detected dev command]`
- Build: `[detected build command]`
- Lint: `[detected lint command]`

## Project Structure
[Key directory → purpose map]

## Conventions
- [Commit style if detectable]
- [PR workflow if detectable]
- [Error handling patterns]

Best Practices

Don't read everything — reconnaissance should use Glob and Grep, not Read on every file. Read selectively only for ambiguous signals.

Verify, don't guess — if a framework is detected from config but the actual code uses something different, trust the code.

Respect existing CLAUDE.md — if one already exists, enhance it rather than replacing it. Call out what's new vs existing.

Stay concise — the onboarding guide should be scannable in 2 minutes. Details belong in the code, not the guide.

Flag unknowns — if a convention can't be confidently detected, say so rather than guessing. "Could not determine test runner" is better than a wrong answer.

Anti-Patterns to Avoid

Generating a CLAUDE.md that's longer than 100 lines — keep it focused

Listing every dependency — highlight only the ones that shape how you write code

Describing obvious directory names — src/ doesn't need an explanation

Copying the README — the onboarding guide adds structural insight the README lacks

Examples

Example 1: First time in a new repo

User: "Onboard me to this codebase"
Action: Run full 4-phase workflow → produce Onboarding Guide + Starter CLAUDE.md
Output: Onboarding Guide printed directly to the conversation, plus a CLAUDE.md written to the project root

Example 2: Generate CLAUDE.md for existing project

User: "Generate a CLAUDE.md for this project"
Action: Run Phases 1-3, skip Onboarding Guide, produce only CLAUDE.md
Output: Project-specific CLAUDE.md with detected conventions

Example 3: Enhance existing CLAUDE.md

User: "Update the CLAUDE.md with current project conventions"
Action: Read existing CLAUDE.md, run Phases 1-3, merge new findings
Output: Updated CLAUDE.md with additions clearly marked