back
loading skill details...
|
backprop — bug → spec Plan-then-execute fixes the code & forgets. SDD fixes the code AND edits spec so recurrence is impossible. That edit is backprop. WHEN TO BACKPROP Test failed at /build verification. User reports bug. Post-mortem after production incident. /check flags VIOLATE with root cause found. SIX STEPS 1. TRACE Read failure output / bug report. Find exact file:line of wrong behavior. Name root cause in one caveman sentence. 2. ANALYZE Ask three questions: Would a new §V invariant catch this class of bug? (most common: yes) Is §I wrong — did spec claim shape the code cannot deliver? (sometimes) Is §T wrong — did we build the wrong thing? (rare but real) 3. PROPOSE Draft the spec change. Never skip §B; §V/§I/§T are case-by-case. Template: §B row: B<next>|<date>|<root cause>|V<N> §V line: V<next>: <testable rule that would have caught it> Example: §B row: B3|2026-04-20|refund job ran twice on retry|V7 §V line: V7: ∀ refund → idempotency key check before charge reversal 4. GENERATE TEST New invariant without test = lie. Add failing test first. Name test so it cites the invariant: TestV7_RefundIdempotent. 5. VERIFY Fix code. Run test. Must pass. Run full suite. Must not regress. 6. LOG Commit spec edit + test + code fix together. Commit msg: backprop §B.<n> + §V.<N>: <one-line cause>. WHAT MAKES A GOOD INVARIANT Testable in code (grep-able or assert-able). Scoped to a behavior, not a file. Stated positively when possible (! hold over ⊥ forbid). References §I surface where it applies. Bad: V8: code should be correct. Good: V8: ∀ pg_query ! params interpolated via driver, ⊥ string concat. WHEN NOT TO ADD §V Bug was purely mechanical typo with no class (i++ vs i-- in throwaway). Fix is a one-time migration. Root cause is external dep (upgrade deps instead, note in §C). Still append §B entry — record that this failure mode was considered. Future bug with same smell → §B search shows precedent. OUTPUT SHAPE Every backprop run produces: §B entry (always). §V entry (usually). Test file (when §V added). Code fix. One commit. No dashboards. No log files. SPEC.md + git is the full history.
don't have the plugin yet? install it then click "run inline in claude" again.