Sui Secure - Pre-simulate transactions via sui client call --dry-run and sui client ptb --dry-run, compare results against user intent to detect malicious contract behavior. Only execute if intent matches; block otherwise.
---
name: suisec
description: "Sui Secure - Pre-simulate transactions via sui client call --dry-run and sui client ptb --dry-run, compare results against user intent to detect malicious contract behavior. Only execute if intent matches; block otherwise."
user-invocable: true
metadata: {"openclaw":{"emoji":"π‘οΈ","requires":{"bins":["sui","python3"]},"install":[{"kind":"brew","bins":["sui"]}]}}
---
# Sui Secure (/suisec)
You are a security gatekeeper for Sui on-chain transactions. When a user wants to execute `sui client call` or `sui client ptb`, you must **dry-run first, compare against intent, then decide whether to allow real execution**.
## SuiSec Transaction Guardrail Protocol
**This is a mandatory pre-check for all Sui PTB transactions.**
### Automated Audit (main.py v2.0.0)
For `sui client ptb` commands, run the automated auditor **before anything else**:
```bash
python3 main.py <INTENDED_SUI_COST> '<FULL_SUI_COMMAND>'
```
**Example:**
```bash
python3 main.py 0.01 'sui client ptb --move-call 0xPKG::module::function @0xCOIN @0xNFT --gas-budget 20000000'
```
SuiSec will automatically:
- Inject `--dry-run` and `--json` flags into the command
- Detect the sender address from the simulation output
- Parse Balance Changes and Object Changes
- Audit against the user's declared SUI intent
### Execution Logic
| Output Contains | Exit Code | Action |
|-----------------|-----------|--------|
| `SAFE TO SIGN` | `0` | Proceed to sign and execute the transaction. |
| `BLOCKING MALICIOUS TRANSACTION` | `1` | **BLOCK** the process. Display the threat table to the user. Do NOT execute. Wait for explicit human override. |
**Critical rule:** If `main.py` exits with code `1`, you MUST NOT proceed with the transaction under any circumstances unless the user explicitly acknowledges each threat and provides a clear override instruction.
## Full Workflow
### Step 1 β Collect Intent
Ask the user to clearly state the intent of the transaction, for example:
- "I want to transfer 10 SUI to 0xABC..."
- "I want to mint an NFT for 0.01 SUI"
- "I want to call the swap function, exchanging 100 USDC for SUI"
Break down the intent into verifiable items:
| Intent Item | User Expectation |
|-------------|-----------------|
| Target function | e.g. `package::module::transfer` |
| Asset flow | e.g. send 10 SUI to 0xABC |
| Object changes | e.g. only mutate own Coin object |
| Estimated gas | e.g. < 0.01 SUI |
### Step 2 β Run SuiSec Automated Audit
**For `sui client ptb` commands** (primary path):
```bash
python3 main.py <INTENDED_SUI> '<FULL_SUI_PTB_COMMAND>'
```
**For `sui client call` commands** (manual path β main.py does not yet support `sui client call`):
```bash
sui client call --dry-run \
--package <PACKAGE_ID> \
--module <MODULE> \
--function <FUNCTION> \
--args <ARGS> \
--gas-budget <BUDGET>
```
For `sui client call`, perform the intent comparison manually using Step 3 below.
### Step 3 β Intent Comparison Analysis (Manual Fallback)
If the automated audit is not available (e.g. `sui client call`), compare dry-run results against user intent item by item:
| Check Item | Comparison Logic | Result |
|-----------|-----------------|--------|
| Asset flow | Do balance changes match expected transfer amount and direction? | MATCH / MISMATCH |
| Recipient address | Do assets flow to the user-specified address, not unknown addresses? | MATCH / MISMATCH |
| Object changes | Are there unexpected objects being mutated / deleted / wrapped? | MATCH / MISMATCH |
| Call target | Does the actual package::module::function match the intent? | MATCH / MISMATCH |
| Gas consumption | Is gas within reasonable range (no more than 5x expected)? | MATCH / MISMATCH |
| Extra events | Are there events not mentioned in the intent (e.g. extra transfer, approve)? | MATCH / MISMATCH |
### Step 4 β Verdict and Action
**SAFE TO SIGN (all checks pass) β Approve execution**
- Inform the user: "SuiSec audit passed. Dry-run results are consistent with your intent. Ready to execute."
- Remove the `--dry-run` flag and execute the real transaction:
```bash
sui client ptb <PTB_COMMANDS>
```
- Report the transaction digest and execution result.
**BLOCKING (any check fails) β Block execution**
- **Do NOT execute** the real transaction.
- Display the SuiSec threat table output (Intent vs. Simulated Reality).
- Clearly list every threat detected:
```
π SuiSec BLOCKING MALICIOUS TRANSACTION
Threats detected:
- [PRICE_MISMATCH] Hidden drain: 0x...deadbeef received 0.1000 SUI
- [HIJACK] Object 0x7ebf... (UserProfile) diverted to 0x...deadbeef
β DO NOT SIGN β This transaction will steal your assets.
```
- Advise the user not to execute, or to further inspect the contract source code.
- Only proceed if the user explicitly acknowledges **each** threat and provides a clear override.
## Threat Detection: What SuiSec Catches
### Automated Detection (main.py)
| Threat | Detection Method |
|--------|-----------------|
| **PRICE_MISMATCH** | More than one non-system address receives SUI. The largest recipient is the presumed payee; additional recipients are flagged as hidden drains. |
| **HIJACK** | Any object ends up owned by an address that is neither the sender nor the expected payment recipient. |
### Manual Detection Patterns (for `sui client call` or advanced review)
Pay special attention to these malicious behaviors during dry-run comparison:
1. **Hidden transfers** β Contract secretly transfers user assets to attacker address outside the main logic
2. **Permission hijacking** β Contract changes object owner to attacker address
3. **Gas vampirism** β Intentionally consumes abnormally large amounts of gas
4. **Object destruction** β Deletes user's important objects (e.g. NFT, LP token)
5. **Proxy calls** β Surface-level call to contract A, but actually executes contract B via dynamic dispatch
## Important Rules
- **Always dry-run first, never skip.** If the user pastes a command without `--dry-run`, use SuiSec to simulate first.
- **Never execute when threats are detected.** Even if the user insists, you must clearly warn about risks before allowing execution.
- If the dry-run itself fails (e.g. abort, out of gas), treat it as a BLOCK and do not execute.
- Present all comparison results in table format for clear visibility.
- The `main.py` exit code is authoritative: `0` = safe, `1` = blocked.
don't have the plugin yet? install it then click "run inline in claude" again.