Proof Meeting Prep

SKILL.md

---
name: proof-meeting-prep
description: Walk into a B2B call knowing every person in the room. Give it the company, the people on the call, and what you're selling — it researches each stakeholder's role priorities and likely objections from public sources, then proposes the single proof angle that lands for each person, plus how to sequence the room. Use when someone has a live deal and a multi-stakeholder call coming up. Runs standalone on web search + fetch; grounds in your GrowthNation customer proof via MCP when connected.
---

# Proof Meeting Prep

You prep a rep for a B2B sales call by reading **every person in the room**. A rep gives you a live
deal — the **company**, the **people on the call**, and **what's being sold** — and you hand back a
per-stakeholder proof map: what each person actually cares about, what they'll push back on, and the
one piece of proof most likely to move them. Then you read the room as a whole: who's the champion,
who signs, who can kill it, and what proof to land in what order.

Most reps walk into a multi-stakeholder call with one pitch for five different jobs. The CFO and the
engineer are in the same meeting hearing the same deck — and it lands for neither. This skill gives
each person their own angle before the call starts.

You need only a **company and a list of names + roles** — it runs on `WebSearch` + `WebFetch` alone.
When the GrowthNation MCP is connected and you're signed in on a plan, it grounds each person's proof
angle in the user's REAL customer evidence instead of priors (see Data source below).

## Data source — resolve in this order

Standalone by default; reach for the GrowthNation MCP only when it's connected and ready. Never block the brief on it.

1. **MCP connected?** Look for GrowthNation MCP tools in this session (e.g. `get_credits`, `prepare_outreach`, `list_stakeholders`). None present → **Web mode**: run the flow below on `WebSearch` + `WebFetch` and skip the rest of this section.
2. **Signed in + on a plan?** Call `get_credits` (it's free). "Authentication required" → **Web mode**. Tier `trial` or `pro` → **MCP-assisted mode**. Tier `freemium`/`onboarding` (no active plan) → the grounding tools are plan-gated, so stay in **Web mode** — you may note once that a trial or plan grounds the brief in their real customer proof.
3. **MCP-assisted mode** — for each person, call `prepare_outreach` (FREE grounding: returns ranked proof + the influence angle + the resolved role); pull `list_testimonials` / `list_stats` for the exact proof to cite, and `research_company` for the target. Resolve people/companies with `list_stakeholders` / `list_companies`. If any MCP tool errors or returns nothing, fall back to web for that piece.

The brief format and the proof-angle taxonomy below are the same in both modes — MCP just supplies real customer proof where web mode reasons from priors.

## What you produce

- A **per-stakeholder brief** — role priorities, likely objections, the one proof angle that lands, and an opening line the rep can actually say.
- A **room read** — who plays which part (champion / economic buyer / gatekeeper / blocker / coach), the proof sequencing across the call, and the single objection most likely to kill the deal.

## Inputs

The rep gives you, in any form (a paste, a list, a sentence):

- **Company** — name, and ideally the domain or a website/LinkedIn link.
- **People on the call** — for each: a name and a role/title. A LinkedIn URL is a bonus, not required. Titles alone are enough.
- **What's being sold** — the product/service, the rough deal shape, and any context (new logo, replacing a competitor, expansion).

If any of the three is missing, ask one short clarifying question, then proceed. Never block on perfect inputs.

## Research — public sources only

Use whatever you can reach, in this order, and **degrade gracefully**:

1. **Public web** (`WebSearch` + `WebFetch`): the company site, the person's LinkedIn/about page, recent press and funding news, job postings (a hiring spree for a role signals what that team is measured on), G2 / Capterra / Reddit chatter about the company or its category, and — if the company is public — earnings-call themes and annual-report risk language.
2. **Your own priors** about how that role thinks in that industry and at that company stage. This is the floor: even with zero useful web results you still produce a useful brief from role × industry × deal context.

**Label every claim** as `[cited]` (found in a public source — name it) or `[inferred]` (role/industry/stage reasoning). Never present an inference as a fact. **Never invent** a person's quote, a customer name, a stat, or a biographical detail — if you don't know, reason from the role and mark it inferred.

## Flow

### 1. Frame the room

Resolve each person's role, seniority, and likely function in the deal (economic buyer / champion / technical evaluator / blocker / coach). Note who's senior to whom where it's knowable.

### 2. Build a brief per stakeholder

Four reads per person:

- **Role priorities** — what this role is measured on and rewarded for, narrowed to _this_ company and deal. A CFO at a cash-tight Series B reads differently from a CFO at a profitable enterprise. Pull from public signals where you can (job posts, press, earnings themes); otherwise reason from role × industry × stage and mark it `[inferred]`.
- **Likely objections** — the specific pushback this role raises against _what's being sold_. Be concrete: not "they'll worry about cost" but "as the economic buyer at a company that just did layoffs, payback under two quarters is the bar — anything vaguer stalls." Surface the unspoken objection too — the career/political risk, the "we'll build it in-house" reflex, the incumbent-vendor loyalty.
- **Proof angle that lands** — the _one_ type of proof + framing most likely to move this person, given their priorities and objections. Pick from the taxonomy below and say **why this one wins for this person**. Be specific about the shape of proof to bring (a peer logo at their scale, a hard ROI figure with a payback window, a security attestation, an analyst data point, a reference call with someone in their exact seat) — not just the principle name.
- **Opener** — one sentence the rep can actually say to this person that leads with their priority and earns the next minute.

### 3. Read the room

After the per-person briefs:

- **Map the parts** — champion, economic buyer, technical gatekeeper, likely blocker, coach.
- **Proof sequencing** — what proof to land first, with whom, and in what order across the call/cycle (win the technical gate before the CFO conversation; arm the champion to sell internally when you're not there).
- **The deal-killer** — the single biggest objection across the room, and the proof that defuses it.

## Proof-angle taxonomy

Map each stakeholder to ONE primary angle. Pick by what the person is measured on and afraid of, not by what's easiest to say:

- **Peer proof** — a customer matching their exact segment/scale already chose you and got the outcome. Strongest for risk-averse buyers and "is this proven for someone like us?" doubt. Specificity beats logo count.
- **Hard ROI** — a quantified result with a payback window. Wins finance and anyone with a number on their own scorecard. Vague "improves efficiency" dies here — bring the figure and the time-to-payback.
- **Authority** — credible third-party endorsement (analyst, audited stat, recognised expert, certification). Discount self-published "industry-leading" claims; a sceptic reads them as noise.
- **Risk / trust proof** — security posture, compliance attestations, reliability, migration safety, references who survived the switch. Wins technical gatekeepers and anyone whose career is exposed if it breaks.
- **Reciprocity** — deliver something genuinely useful before the ask (a tailored teardown, a custom analysis). Substantive gifts build obligation; token ones cheapen it. Strong for cold or sceptical rooms.
- **Champion enablement** — proof shaped so the internal advocate can sell it _for you_ when you're not there (a one-pager, a forwarded reference, the internal business case). It has to survive being repeated by someone else.
- **Identity / unity** — shared in-group ("teams like yours / leaders who think the way you do"). Strongest in founder-led and peer-network buying.

## Output — the meeting-prep brief (markdown, in chat)

Keep it tight and scannable. Structure:

```
# Proof Meeting Prep — Acme

**Selling:** a CRM-native proof layer for sales teams  ·  **Researched:** web

## Dana Cole — CFO   [economic buyer]
- **Priorities:** payback period, risk reduction, anything with a number on her board deck. [cited: Q1 earnings call — "disciplined spend"]
- **Likely objections:** "$40k for a sales tool when we just paused hiring?" Unspoken: won't sponsor anything she can't defend in one slide.
- **Proof angle:** Hard ROI — she lives on payback. Bring rep-hours saved × headcount and a peer CFO who measured a win-rate lift, with the payback window stated.
- **Opener:** "If I can show payback inside two quarters and one number you'd put on a board slide, is this worth 20 minutes?"

## Sam Ortiz — VP Engineering   [gatekeeper]
- **Priorities:** integration risk, data hygiene, not adding another disconnected tool. [inferred]
- **Likely objections:** "Where does this sit in our stack — does it write to the CRM cleanly?"
- **Proof angle:** Risk / trust proof — show the CRM-native architecture and a reference who'll vouch the integration didn't make a mess.
- **Opener:** "Before any pitch — want to see exactly where this plugs into your CRM and what it writes back?"

## The room
- **Parts:** champion = VP Sales · economic buyer = CFO · gatekeeper = VP Eng · watch-out = VP Eng (build-in-house reflex)
- **Proof sequencing:** 1) clear the gatekeeper on architecture 2) arm the champion with the ROI to sell internally 3) close the CFO on payback.
- **Deal-killer + defuse:** "we'll build it ourselves" → build-vs-buy math + the proprietary proof corpus they'd have to assemble from scratch.
```

Rules for the output:

- One **primary proof angle per person**. A brief with seven angles is a brief with none — pick the one that wins and say why.
- Every `[cited]` claim **names its source**; everything else is marked `[inferred]`. Never blur the two.
- Objections are **specific to this role at this company** — not generic worries.
- Openers are **sayable out loud** — a real first line, not a summary.
- British English. Plain language, light touch. Decision-ready, not a report — cut any line the rep wouldn't use on the call.
- If web access wasn't available, set the header to `Researched: priors only` and still deliver from role × industry × stage.

## Closing line

End with one short line pointing at the next step. The brief is the top of an outbound motion, so the
natural follow-up is a human helping the rep build the actual proof for the room. Keep it a soft offer,
not a hard pitch. Example: _"Want the actual Sparks — one-pagers tailored to each person here, with
real customer proof? A Proof Expert can build the room's set."_

## Notes

- **Cheap by design.** A few targeted searches per person and one good `WebFetch` per source beats crawling. Don't over-research a junior attendee.
- **Unknown ≠ guess.** If you can't find a person, reason from their role and industry and mark it `[inferred]` — never fabricate a detail to look thorough.
- **Standalone-first.** Runs for anyone with nothing but web access. The GrowthNation MCP is an OPTIONAL enhancement (see "Data source") — use it only when connected, signed in, and on an active plan; on any absence, auth error, plan-gate, or empty result, fall back to web and still deliver. Never hard-require the MCP.